Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Group Info Group Founded 3 Years ago Statistics 285 Members
16,420 Pageviews331 Watchers
The following contains key excerpts by Nina Berman, photographer and an associate professor at Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism, for the Columbia Journalism Review - MARCH 9, 2015

-

There are certain things photojournalists are never supposed to do if they want to remain credible visual communicators. They are worth reviewing to understand the ethical cyclone that struck one of the profession’s most prestigious awards organizations.

:bulletred: Photojournalists should not arrive to take someone’s photograph and start telling them what to do, to pump their fist or hold a sign a certain way. The rules are more flexible when taking a portrait — the idea being that the very essence of portraiture suggests something’s been posed. But for everything else, no posing.
:bulletred:We should not construct a scene and pass it off as a “found” moment. Once we have taken the shot, we should not add or remove objects during post-processing. The editing done in this phase should be about sharpening the image, not fabricating a new one.
:bulletred:We should not lie or mislead in writing captions for our photos.
:bulletred:We should not change the emotional trajectory of a situation by encouraging protagonists to make nice, or toughen up.

These are some of the basics. And then there is the practice.

As a photographer covering presidential politics in the 1990s I watched in astonishment as the most prominent wire service and magazine photographers routinely directed candidates into positions they thought would make the best photographs:

“Stand this way, Governor Clinton, closer to your wife. Put your arm around her.”

“Look this way, Senator Dole. How about a thumbs up!”

One photographer who was known for privileged access stood on a New York City stage and directed campaign staff to refocus the spotlights prior to an event so that the exposures would be more favorable to his frame.

If national picture editors didn’t know this was happening they should have known. We all knew.

Are these manipulations minor aesthetic adjustments or unethical intrusions and for what intent — to clarify a story or create one that mainly exists in the mind of the maker? That’s the crux of the controversy which for the last month has rocked World Press Photo, one of the industry’s most influential and respected organizations.

If you haven’t been following the story, these are the bare bones: On February 12, after reviewing 97,912 images submitted by 5,692 international photographers, the World Press jury announced multiple photo awards, with its top prize, photo of the year going to Danish photographer Mads Nissen for a quiet image of a gay couple in St. Petersburg, Russia. Discussion of the photograph’s merits was drowned out by the parallel announcement that 22 percent of the entries that made it to the final round were disqualified for sloppy or blatant post processing.

Once we saw the evidence, we were shocked.

Nearly all digital files require some post processing — changes in contrast, light, shadow, white balance, and sharpening done to a digital file before it is sent for publication. This work can be done by photographers before they file, picture editors, and in the past darkroom technicians. But it’s going too far when objects are added or removed, or the scene is radically transformed through excessive burning or dodging.

By looking only at the photograph, it can be almost impossible to tell something has been excessively doctored. But the WPP requires that once an image advances to the finals, photographers must submit the raw (unprocessed) files for expert review.

The chatter over post-processing dimmed temporarily when a new photographic ethics controversy tripped onto center stage during the WPP contest. Photojournalists, bloggers, even public officials began scrutinizing the work of Giovanni Troilo, whose color series shows images of public sex, dementia, and fear within the Belgian city of Charleroi. He titled it, “La Ville Noir”—The Dark Heart of Europe.

Critics charged that he staged events. One image shows a couple having sex in a car. The man turned out to be his cousin. Did he ask his cousin to perform? The captions were unclear. Another showed a naked woman in a cage, which the photographer said was not unusual given that the woman and her husband are involved in BDSM. The Mayor of Charleroi chimed in with a letter to World Press saying the entire series was a work of fantasy and a gross misrepresentation of his city.

The critics piled on. And then Jean Francois Leroy, the director of one the largest photojournalism festivals in the world, Visa Pour L’image in Perpignan, France, announced that he was canceling the World Press Photo exhibition this year.

The organization was placed in a difficult position, having to defend their stance against too much post processing while appearing to play fast and loose with one of the most basic tenants of photojournalism: thou shalt not stage images that the viewer assumes to be genuine.

WPP requested more caption information from the photographer, who explained the work this way:

“Some scenes just happened in front of the camera (policemen, clinic, pills and building) and I just found the way to be in the right place, but without any dialog between me and the subjects. In other scenes, like in the cage for example, the presence of the camera was declared, there was obviously a dialog necessary to setting up a proper portrait session. All of the photos were taken with the utmost transparency and correctness. In instances where the subjects are aware that they are being photographed, the original caption says so.”
Last week, WPP revoked Troilo’s prize, but for a different reason. Another photographer came forward to allege that one of Troilo’s pictures was taken in Brussels when the caption claimed it was shot in Charleroi. Miscaptioning is a definite violation of the rules, but it’s also an Al Capone-style solution — if we can’t get him on murder let’s get him for tax evasion.

And so little was resolved.

Is this a case of semantics? Or a clash of two styles of photography trying to exist in a contest that used to show mainly one? Is it an indication that the field is rapidly changing and a new definition is needed for photojournalism and documentary work? Are these the most important questions to ask when dealing with an inherently subjective medium, which aspires to communicate a vision of accepted truth? And whose truth for what purpose?

Before the great media disruption, photographers were sent out on a story for weeks, sometimes months. The purpose was for the photographer to watch. Quietly, patiently, carefully observing subtle changes in mood, emotion, light, shadow, and through framing and positioning, and trusted relationships with subjects, we were to bring back images that reflected an uncompromised, closely seen reality.


Photography is an inherently subjective medium. Calling it photojournalism embeds the image with an expectation of truth. But from the moment I choose where to stand, when to stand there, who comes with me as a guide or censor, where I point my gaze, which lens I use to see, how much light fills the frame, these are all subjective decisions. Is a balanced exposure a politically neutral one? Should I use a flash to turn a gray sky blue? Should I silhouette faces into darkened shapes, and create an image which sails past the forensic file analysts and WPP jurors, but may not be anything like what the human eye sees?


What are your thoughts?
- Best, Timothy


Afghan artist dons armor to protest street harassment



Afghan performance artist Kubra Khademi was just 4 years old the first time she was molested by a stranger on the street, and recalls thinking one thing: "I wish my underwear was made of iron."

So more than 20 years later she donned a suit of armor with large breasts and buttocks and wore it on the streets of Kabul to protest Afghanistan's endemic harassment.

The eight-minute performance was not well received: She is now in hiding and afraid for her life. But after a lifetime of being pinched and prodded on the streets — and being told to keep quiet about it — the 27 year old is determined to break her deeply conservative society's silence on sexual harassment.



kubra


Khademi was four when a stranger touched her bottom while she was walking to a shop near her family's home in Quetta, Pakistan, where they had joined a tide of refugees fleeing war and the brutal rule of the ultra-conservative Taliban. She was molested in the streets on many other occasions throughout her life, including one instance shortly after she had returned to Afghanistan in 2008 to take entrance exams to study fine arts at Kabul University.

On that occasion, she screamed, assuming someone would come to her aid. Instead, the crowd turned on her.

"All the people stared at me and even started yelling at me: 'You whore! How dare you scream! Did you enjoy it?'" Khademi told The Associated Press.


kubra


When she put on the suit of armor and returned to the crowded Kabul neighborhood where she had been harassed in 2008, the crowd turned on her again. People threw stones and threatened to beat her, and after just eight minutes she declared the performance over and returned to her car, which was surrounded and damaged by the angry mob.



kubra kubra
kubra kubra
AP Photo/Massoud Hossaini


But amid the melee at least one person seemed to understand the message.

"Look at that girl," she recounted a boy saying who was about 10, not much older than she had been on that distant day in Quetta. "She doesn't want to be touched."



Read the full AP article here: 

Afghan artist dons armor to protest street harassment 



More Journal Entries

Recent Journal Entries

Visitors

You're not here because you're not logged in
  • :iconshakilovneel:
    ShakilovNeel - Members
    Visited here 23 hours, 38 minutes ago
    Submitted a deviation yesterday
  • :iconharrietsfriend:
    harrietsfriend - Members
    Visited here 1 day, 16 hours ago
    Submitted a deviation 2 days ago
  • :iconcarmelroseregencia:
    CarmelRoseRegencia
    Visited here 3 days, 15 hours ago
    Isn't a member
  • :icontagfoto:
    TAGFoto - Members
    Visited here 4 days, 4 hours ago
    Submitted a deviation 4 days ago
  • :iconbasseca:
    basseca - Members
    Visited here 4 days, 18 hours ago
    Submitted a deviation 5 days ago

The Correspondent


 TC




Photojournalism
The Art Of Communicating News By Photography.




 Gallery

 Journals

 Favourites




IMPORTANT:

We are a Photojournalism only group.
If you have an interest in photojournalism please feel free to join us.




Submission guidelines are as follows

:bulletblack: Photojournalism only.
:bulletblack: Four submissions only per week (5 for contributors)
:bulletblack: Photos must be news related and therefore should have
text explaining the situation in your artist's comments


Submissions that will be declined:

:bulletred: Modelling, wedding and glamour
:bulletred: Heavily manipulated including selective colour
:bulletred: Self portraits-pets-your car etc
:bulletred: Hate
:bulletred: Extensive or DA watermarks

:bulletgreen: Discreet signatures, however, are acceptable.

Group admin reserves the right to remove, without notice, photos that are accidentally accepted or found to be unsuitable.

* * * * * * *

"I believe that the chief value of photography as a means of communication depends entirely on the ability of the camera to arrest life instantly. It thrills me to speculate how the invention of photography has contributed to the speeding up of human reflexes. The rapidly working camera has sharpened man’s capacity to observe and observe rapidly; it has taught many of us to use our minds to classify visual phenomena in an instant of time; to relate our own attitude to that of the person in front of the camera in a split second. This to my mind is the essence of photojournalism" - Jozef Gross

* * * * * * *


:iconthecorrespondent:






Locations of Site Visitors

Gallery Folders

Journals

Favourites

Admins

Deviants

Affiliates

:iconweheartphotos::iconurbanlifephotography::icondevnews::iconthestreetjournal::iconearth-scriptures::iconportrait-parables::iconthestreetfactor:

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
:iconhosagu:
hosagu Featured By Owner Mar 10, 2015  Hobbyist Photographer
Thank you :heart:
Reply
:iconpierre-lagarde:
Pierre-Lagarde Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2015
Et merci pour tout :hug:
Reply
:iconcorvidae65:
Corvidae65 Featured By Owner Jan 18, 2015
Thank you again :thanks:
Reply
:iconearthhart:
EarthHart Featured By Owner Jan 18, 2015  Hobbyist Photographer
Many thanks for the acceptances :iconahoyplz:
Reply
:iconcorvidae65:
Corvidae65 Featured By Owner Jan 13, 2015
Thank you :thanks:
Reply
Add a Comment: